evaluation+criteria+D+block

Evaluation Criteria (D Block)
Organization (easy to use)

Clear and Concise Ideas

Relevant Information (stays on topic)

Academically Honest (MLA) - in text citations, works cited

Technique is applied to different services

Credebility of the Information

Creativity and BORED-O-METER (the style of presentation, holds the readers attention)

Appeals to different learning guides (visual, aural, kinesthetic)

Keywords Searching
Organization (easy to use)
 * Organized very well, especially the headings that can be differentiated. Also well structured overall.**

Clear and Concise Ideas Ideas are clear and easy to follow

Relevant Information (stays on topic) Information is relevant to topic

Academically Honest (MLA) - in text citations, works cited great use of in-text citations, work cited list present at bottom.

Technique is applied to different services All different services are represented.

Credebility of the Information All sites are credible as they are either from the website itself or from an .org or .edu site.

Creativity and BORED-O-METER (the style of presentation, holds the readers attention) This is where the entry might fall short as not much is done to hold the reader's attention throughout the wall of text.

Appeals to different learning guides (visual, aural, kinesthetic) Good use of tables, but other than that not much appeals to visual learners. Could appeal to kinesthetic learners more by utilizing widgets and etc.

Proximity Searching
**Organization (easy to use) ** The page is very organized, it is divided clearly into comprehensive and useful sections that connect logically from one to the next. Yes, the ideas are clear and concise. **Relevant Information (stays on topic)** The page has very relevant information. They’re not redundant in any part. **Academically Honest (MLA) - in text citations, works cited** The citations are not in alphabetical order and you’ve forgotten to include the publication dates and the url for the last citation. Also you didn’t cite your images properly. **Technique is applied to different services** Very comprehensive explanations of differences between services and good identification of unique features of individual services. **Credibility of the Information** The sites you used are all credible because most are .edu sites and primary sources. VERY CREATIVE BECAUSE OF YOUR IMAGES WITH HANDWRITTEN ANNOTATIONS (COOLIO!) We were (surprisingly) not bored. And creative addition with the “now you try it!” google search bar.
 * Clear and Concise Ideas **
 * Creativity and BORED-O-METER (the style of presentation, holds the readers attention) **

It appeals to learners who learn best visually, through reading, and kinesthetically too (thanks to the google search bar). This covers an extremely wide range of learners already (unusually wide given that it is only a blog!)
 * Appeals to different learning guides (visual, aural, kinesthetic)**